Biz Book Friday


2
Dec 11

Terry Pratchett’s Witches Mean Business — *Your* Business (Biz Book Friday)

Hello, and welcome to yet another Biz Book Friday! This one’s a bit late because I’m feeling under the weather. Hope you enjoy it nonetheless. There are, of course, many more to choose from — on, admittedly, more serious, actionable topics. Today I’m feeling philosophical.

All my favorite authors are dyed-in-the-wool humanists. You get the feeling from their words that they’ve looked at all of humanity… and they’ve seen the punchline. They’re laughing, even while their hearts encompass the whole world.

Terry Pratchett certainly fits that description.

In the Discworld, witches stand for stalwartness, doing what needs to be done, thinking what needs to be thought — and seeing what’s really there.

And so, today’s Biz Book Friday, I present to you excerpts from Wee Free Men, wherein our young hero (a 9-year-old dairy maid named Tiffany Aching) finds herself to be a witch.

But really, the lessons she learns apply to everything.

On the way that the world looks at competent, successful people:

People tended to leave Tiffany alone. There was nothing particularly cruel or unpleasant about this, but the farm was big and everyone had their jobs to do, and she did hers very well and so she became, in a way, invisible.

I truly believe that one of the biggest diseases infecting smart, competent people today is the belief that being smart and competent and good at your job is good enough to get you noticed. That they are, somehow, expecting more — and succumbing to anger & bitterness when more fails to arrive.

On the magical school for witchcraft:

“Can I go there by magic? Does, like, a unicorn turn up to carry me there or something?”

“Why should it? A unicorn is nothing more than a big horse that comes to a point, anyway. Nothing to get so excited about,” said Miss Tick.

I swear this is not wear my slay-the-unicorns ideology comes from… but I wouldn’t mind if it did. (In a way, this awesome series of books is the anti-Harry Potter. I know which I’d read to any innocent, unsuspecting child in my care.)

On the way that life tests you before you’ve got any business being tested:

“The thing about witchcraft,” said Mistress Weatherwax, “is that it’s not like school at all. First you get the test, and then afterward you spend years findin’ out how you passed it. It’s a bit like life in that respect.”

As in life, so in business.

On the necessity of first principles for survival:

The one thing in her bag that might have made anyone suspicious was a very small, grubby booklet entitled An Introduction to Escapology, by the Great Williamson. If one of the risks of your job is being thrown into a pond with your hands tied together, then the ability to swim thirty yards underwater, fully clothed, plus the ability to lurk under the weeds breathing air through a hollow reed, count as nothing if you aren’t also amazingly good with knots.

As in life, so in the marketplace.

On writing benefits into your marketing copy:

THE WONDERS OF PUNCTUATION AND SPELLING:

1. ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY ABOUT THE COMMA!
2. I BEFORE E COMPLETELY SORTED OUT!
3. THE MYSTERY OF THE SEMICOLON REVEALED!!!
4. SEE THE AMPERSAND! (SMALL EXTRA CHARGE)
5. FUN WITH BRACKETS!

Although, if you’re a student of mine, you know that even this enlivening take on grammar doesn’t go far enough.

On (not) giving people what they want:

Footnote on ‘misfortune telling’: Ordinary fortune-tellers tell you what you want to happen; witches tell you what’s going to happen whether you want it to or not. Strangely enough, witches tend to be more accurate but less popular.

The thing about business is that it is, primarily, about business. When you try to sell something people don’t want, well, you’re shit outta luck. That doesn’t mean you should, for example, go tell lies instead of true fortunes. It means that maybe you’re not cut out for the fortune telling business in general.

Til next time!

Read deep and enjoy.

Previous Biz Book Fridays:


25
Nov 11

Startups & Risk: Petting Puppies with Peter Drucker

It’s that time again! No, not turkey-stuffing-cranberry-yam-and-marshmallow sandwich time. No, not pepper-spray-your-fellow-Black-Friday-shoppers time. No, silly… it’s Biz Book Friday! Today, a little change of pace: Peter Drucker. And puppies.

Who wants to start a business? You do!

Who wants to pet a puppy?

You do!

So… which puppy do you pet?

Pick a puppy! Aka The Nature of Risk

Well, that depends, I suppose.

Exactly how attached are you to that hand?

Towards a Philosophy of Puppy Stroking

Say you are an indiscriminate puppy pat-er. You see four legs and a tail and you just can’t keep your hands to yourself.

So you walk by the junkyard one day and LOOK! A PUPPY! Your tic kicks in. You slip your fingers through the chain link fence so that you can get your puppy fix. From the 150-pound, slavering, red-eyed menace. Here, boy!

One day, I expect, you will find yourself to be a very excellent one-handed typist.

But what if you practice safe pets?

What if you limit your doggy-stroking adventures to the fluffy pom used for animal therapy visits at the local preschool?

The chances are extremely good that you will die of old age and be buried with a full complement of 10 wiggly little digits.

Puppies are Serious Business™… and risk is a lie

We’re talking about puppies, but we’re really talking about your business. Get it? Whether you call it a “startup” or “small business,” a “lifestyle business” or a “baconbiz” or “my little side gig,” the facts are the facts:

Risk is not risk.

We talk about it like it’s a real, concrete, immutable thing.

But risk is like puppy-petting: it involves choices. You can choose to be smart, and snuggly, or dumb, and finger-less.

I’m not saying that there’s anything wrong with a high-risk venture. But it’s far from the only choice… and what’s more, even things you’d assume are high-risk don’t have to be.

Risk is not absolute. It depends on your choices. Yes, that’s right: you get to choose how much risk to expose yourself to. Amazing!

Fluff Ball Puppy with Top Hat & Monocole

Old school biz peeps know this — startups don’t

Entrepreneurship is “risky” mainly because so few of the so-called entrepreneurs know what they are doing. They lack the methodology. They violate elementary and well-known rules. This is particularly true of high-tech entrepreneurs.

Ahhh, the bitchslap of reality. From the past.

That passage hails from Peter Drucker’s Innovation and Entrepreneurship, published in 1985. Yes, over 26 years ago.

Still true. True-r, even.

Peter Drucker’s got a drum — a true-r drum — and he’s gonna beat it, giving us all a good what-for:

Those entrepreneurs who start out with the idea that they’ll make it big—and in a hurry—can be guaranteed failure. They are almost bound to do the wrong things.

Oh, really, Peter Drucker? Tell us more!

The entrepreneur is therefore well advised to forgo innovations based on bright ideas, however enticing the success stories. After all, somebody wins a jackpot on the Las Vegas slot machines every week, yet the best any one slot-machine player can do is try not lose more than he or she can afford.

We need to systematize, he tells us. (Sound familiar?) We need to base our entrepreneurship off research and analysis and understanding, rather than woo-woo hand-waving and hagiography and awed, prideful worship of the “bright idea.”

And, he says, people get really confused about what high-tech entrepreneurship looks like.

Junkyard Dog Alert: trying to be Fustest with the Mostest?

Drucker describes 4 basic entrepreneurial strategies. One of them is “Fustest with the Mostest,” a humorous dialect misquotation of Confederate Lieutenant General Nathan Bedford Forrest’s strategy of arriving first to battle with the most men and firepower:

In this strategy the entrepreneur aims at leadership, if not at dominance of a new market or a new industry…

That does sound awfully familiar, doesn’t it? It sounds like what everybody and their finger-crunching dog say about how to do a startup:

  1. Shoot for the moon
  2. Get there first
  3. Dominate
  4. Grow big

Being “Fustest with the Mostest” is the approach that many people consider the entrepreneurial strategy par excellence.

This is true.

Indeed, if one were to go by the popular books on entrepreneurs, one would conclude that being “Fustest with the Mostest” is the only entrepreneurial strategy — and a good many entrepreneurs, especially the high-tech ones, seem to be of the same opinion.

Right you are, Mr. Drucker!

They are wrong, however… *monocle tweak*

What’s that you say? WHAT??

“Fustest with the Mostest” is not even the dominant entrepreneurial strategy, let alone the one with the lowest risk or the highest success ratio. *monocle polish* On the contrary, of all entrepreneurial strategies it is the greatest gamble.

Oh no! The greatest gamble? I don’t believe it! But it must be true… you have a monocle!

Do go on.

And it is unforgiving, making no allowances for mistakes and permitting no second chance.

Argghghg, why?

“Fustest with the Mostest” is very much like a moon shot: a deviation of a fraction of a minute of the arc and the missile disappears into outer space.

BUT… isn’t that good?

The entrepreneur of so much of the popular literature or of Hollywood movies, the person who suddenly has a “brilliant idea” and rushes off to put it into effect, is not going to succeed with it.

In fact, for this strategy to succeed at all, the innovation must be based on a careful and deliberate attempt to exploit one of the major opportunities for innovation that were discussed in Chapters 3 to 9.

AWWW, NOOOOO, EVERYTHING I KNOW IS WRONG. TELL ME WHAT TO DO, PETER DRUCKER. Just give it to me straight. I can take it. *cringe*

["Fustest with the Mostest"] will fail because the will is lacking. It will fail because efforts are inadequate. It will fail because, despite successful innovation, not enough resources are deployed, are available, or are being put to work to exploit success, and so on.

While the strategy is indeed highly rewarding when successful, it is much too risky and much too difficult to be used for anything but major innovations, for creating a new political order… or a new approach…

It requires profound analysis and a genuine understanding of the sources of innovation and of their dynamics. It requires an extreme concentration of effort and substantial resources.

In most cases alternative strategies are available and preferable — not primarily because they carry less risk, but because for most innovations the opportunity is not great enough to justify the cost, the effort, and the investment of resources required for the “Fustest with the Mostest” strategy.

NOOOOOOOOOOoooooOooooOoookay.

In conclusion: Peter Fucking Drucker says,

Back away from that junkyard dog

…unless you’ve got a mesh body suit with anti-flammable padding, a cage, a taser, pepper spray, a whip, a lion tamer sidekick, a djinn, and also ovaries of pure tungsten carbide*.

Your entrepreneurial mission, should you choose to accept it: find and snuggle a friendly pom. Mind the top hat.

And: Buy and read Innovation and Entrepreneurship. You’ll have to read it with the eyes of a soloist or tiny team in the 2010s, and interpret what he says to help you with your situation… and you’ll learn a shitload.

Happy petting.

* Tungsten carbide: the hardest metal that isn’t, in fact a diamond. Psh. Everybody knows diamonds aren’t metal.


18
Nov 11

Startups are a Boy Band (Biz Book Friday!)

Welcome to Biz Book Fridays! I’ve got a whopper of a biz book habit and I’ll read ‘em so you don’t have to. I bring the juiciest morsels straight to you.

Whoooo! After those 3 straight weeks of pricing, I thought we could ALL do with a little change of pace.

And so this week on Biz Book Friday, we’ve got… well… a book that’s not a biz book at all, and instead an excellent novel: Lost in a Good Book: A Thursday Next Story.

Everything’s a Boy Band

“Remember, Thursday, that scientific thought, indeed, any mode of thought whether it be religious or philosophical or anything else, is just like the fashions that we wear—only much longer-lived. It’s a little like a boy band.”

“Scientific thought a boy band? How do you figure that?”

“Well, every now and then a boy band comes along. We like it, buy the records, posters, parade them on TV, idolize them right up until—”

“—the next boy band?” I suggested.

“Precisely. Aristotle was a boy band. A very good one, but only number six or seven. He was the best boy band until Isaac Newton, but even Newton was transplanted by an even newer boy band. Same haircuts—but different moves.”

“Einstein, right?”

“Right. Do you see what I’m saying?”

“That the way we think is nothing more than a passing fad?”

“Exactly. Hard to visualize a new way of thinking? Try this. Go thirty or forty boy bands past Einstein. Where we would regard Einstein as someone who glimpsed a truth, played one good chord in seven forgettable albums.”

Some things are eternal. Just about everything else changes in cycles.

Some of those cycles are pendulums, swinging back and forth between two extremes. Examples: ornamentation and minimalism in design, or religion and reason. The thing about these cycles is that one actively leads to the other, because it’s a rebellion! Then that rebellion becomes commonplace and then people have to rebel against that.

Others are linear, fad giving away to fad, like in physics. (Can’t imagine us returning to pre-Einsteinian physics, can you?)

Boy Band Denial

If you’ve ever read a history book (or watched The Hitler Channel), you know this is true.

But even so… we never prairedog out of our little holes and go “Gee, this is just a cycle.” Nope. We say, “Aha! This is how things should have been all along. The way they will be. And rightly so!”

And… yet… we know that all those long-dead people in the history books thought exactly the same thing. About everything.

Boy Bands: They’re Everywhere!

In software development and design, we have Agile, scrum, pairing, test-first, test-never, lean, customer development, BDD, tooling, personas, no personas, action theory, beauty is function, ornament is a crime, user experience, user centered, undesign.

In business, we have Taylorism, Fordism, TQM, Six Sigma, follow your passion, dig in the muck for the brass, offshoring, outsourcing, home sourcing, human resources, team building exercises, incentives, no incentives, the customer is always right, the employee is always right, hug your customers, work is play, work is work and if you don’t like it there’s more where you came from, collective bargaining, every man for himself.

And then we have startups. Whether they’re funded big, or funded small, angel, VC, seed, institutional backers, pitch contests, startup weekends, liquidity events, go big or go home, “build stuff people want,” “build software that’ll get college students laid,” analytics for pirates or lead from your heart, Maslow, Mojito Island, founder as hustler, founder as hacker, founder as hagiographical hero, lifestyle business, 4-hour-work-week, sixteen-hour-work-day, IPO track, private sale, and of course, invent-your-own-accounting-standard.

These are all boy bands. All of them. Especially startups.

It’s boy bands all the way down.

History shows us that management theory, software development theory, design theory, and most importantly, startup ideology are all extremely faddish. But we treat each new boy band like they’re handed down On High.*

And things get bloody dangerous when we confuse the boy bands of today with Mozart.

* We all know the only boy bands handed down on high were The Beatles and The Dead. Maybe The Scorpions. Nuff said.

Oh yeah. You want more. You wanna subscribe. Doooo ittttt. And follow me on Twitter while you’re at it.


11
Nov 11

Will Low Prices Help You Sell More? (Biz Book Friday!)

Welcome to Biz Book Fridays! I’ve got a whopper of a biz book habit and I’ll read ‘em so you don’t have to. I bring the juiciest morsels straight to you.

Let’s talk about castles.

What do you need to build a castle?

  1. thick, unscalable walls
  2. places to withdraw your bridge
  3. places to drop hot oil, foul water, alligators, etc.
  4. a moat, for preference, and
  5. turrets, lots and lots of turrets

When it comes to making a product, the recipe is just the same. Only with a product, these fortifications have names like:

  1. positioning
  2. Unique Sales Proposition

And so on. The goal is the same: prevent your competitors from breaching your castle and stealing your serfs.

You know, the stuff that makes you different from the other guys.

Stuff they can’t just copy.

In other words: anything but a low price.

Competing on Price: Fools Only

And so, the clever authors of Pricing with Confidence tell us, Low Price is a Dumb Tactic.

Price competition is a fool’s game because any fool can play it.

Yup, anybody can lower a price. Anybody can compete on price. They don’t have to build a castle first. They also don’t have to face the hot oil and/or angry fishwives.

When you lower your price, you stand out… for a moment.

Tomorrow, somebody else less competent, less skilled, can come in, undercut your price, and steal that positin from you.

There’s no sustained advantage to be had through price competition.

…if you do win the order, your satisfaction is quickly undermined by the sneaking suspicion that what you have won is a Pyrrhic victory (another such victory and we are done for!).

That is the power of pricing: a bad price can transform a victory (woo! all those sales!) into a disaster (zomg, the overheads!).

In fact, the authors of Pricing with Confidence assert,

… weak competitors have an advantage in price competition because they’ve got little to lose and nothing else to leverage.

“Little to lose” and “nothing else to leverage” — not labels you want applied to your business, are they?

Why Price Low in the First Place?

Three reasons:

  1. Fear & ignorance. You’re afraid of asking for money, so you think the thing to do is to ask for only a little. It feels safer.
  2. Everybody else does it. (See below)
  3. You want to grab a bigger slice of the marketshare pie. (See below)

I’ve already written about fear & ignorance a bunch of times. (For newbs who got the fear, the D&D test, cake-and-icing pricing, and when customers bitch.) Read on for more of #2 and #3.

Everybody Does It… Don’t They?

Our clients tell us, “We have no choice but to discount because our competitors are nuts.” In fact, the competitors just look like they are nuts because they have the same addiction. By the way, we always tell our clients, “Your competitors are saying the same thing about you, and for precisely the same reason.”

By now you are shaking your head. Of course, you think. It’s obvious now.

When one competitor cuts its prices, it’s exactly like when a customer says you charge too much. We talked about this last time:

When a customer says, “Your price is too high,” your instinct is to respond to it as if it were really a discussion about price. To keep talking about price.

But that instinct is wrong — wrong when it’s a customer conversation, and wrong when it’s a competitor’s action, too.

It’s not about price — it almost never really is. The trick is to remember that, and not get tricked by your lizard brain into reacting without question.

To Grab a Larger Market Share

So maybe you’re too worldly and cynical to price low out of fear or competition. But you’re still tempted. Your considered, logical reason to price low is: to increase market penetration. (Fuck yeah!)

There’s just one problem with this sexy, aggressive tactic:

Does it work?

That’s a question that rarely gets asked. And, as it turns out, it doesn’t:

Elastic markets are quite responsive to changes in price. Inelastic markets are not. Elasticity research tells us when price decreases are going to bring us more revenue.

Do you know if you’re in an elastic market, or an inelastic market? This is important, because it turns out they behave in completely different ways.

A market is only elastic if a lower price convinces more people, total to buy — from you, or anyone. It doesn’t count if a lower price convinces a person who’s already someone else’s customer to switch to you.

Make sense?

Only price low if there’s a chance to capture sales that would never have otherwise happened, ever.

In fact, because of the effects of derived demand — remember, lower prices don’t increase total demand — penetration pricing is poison if you are competing in a mature market.

I wouldn’t go so far as to say that ebooks, screencasts, and web apps are mature markets just yet. They are still growing, and will continue to grow.

But they are based off mature markets. With ebooks & screencasts, there are direct corollaries to books and video training from before (and simple comparisons to live training as well).

With web-based software, the vast majority of your potential customers have already used or bought web-based software.

For customers who have not yet bought ebooks or subscribed to a web app, the hurdles are not cost or price, but a different way of looking at software & education.

If a person hates the idea of paying monthly for software he could “just buy at CompUSA,” no price will convince him otherwise. If a person thinks it’s morally wrong to pay for one person’s well-orchestrated “bits” instead for a 3lb paper book with 42 authors on the cover, it’s not the price that will sway her bias.

So let other people blaze trails with low prices and unsustainable overhead. And let them suffer the consequences.

What to do? The best response is to skim price for high margins at the top of the market and use a neutral pricing strategy for mainstream and low-end market segments.

Charge a higher price, earn more from fewer customers, and serve those few customers better with your limited resources (e.g. your time). Go for the margins, don’t go for broke.

Be like Apple: with 4% of the mobile phone market, they have nearly 50% of all profits.

That’s a great place to be.


4
Nov 11

When Customers Bitch About Your Price (Biz Book Friday)

Welcome to Biz Book Fridays! I’ve got a whopper of a biz book habit and I’ll read ‘em so you don’t have to. I bring the juiciest morsels straight to you.

Sooooo, you’ve got a product. You priced it. You’re marketing it. You’re making sales… or you’re trying to.

But you keep getting push-back on the price. Maybe people are writing in to tell you you’re “fuckin’ crazy.” (This has happened to me!) Or maybe people are telling you politely that your product costs too much. Maybe they’re begging for discounts.

That’s what today’s Biz Book Friday is all about.

Today’s source is very excellent (if dry) Pricing with Confidence. (Yup, the same book I used last time, about cake-and-icing pricing.)

Talk, Talk, Talk About Money…

How much of your time & marketing copy do you spend talking about price?

If all you talk about with customers is price, there is no price that is going to be low enough.

And it’s true, too. You know it, if you’ve ever gone to Target (or Amazon) to buy a toaster, a blender, a vacuum, or a digital camera… and found yourself comparing the individual products based a bunch of specs you never even knew about or cared about before.

Just because those specs were there, they became a data point. An important data point.

Price is like that. In our fear, we tend to think it is the data point. But, in fact, it’s simply a data point.

By making price front & center, we give it more power, and we lead customers to shop on price instead of a million other specs they could shop on: design, customer service, value, reliability, performance, enjoyment, clarity, time saved…

Takeaway: don’t fuel your customers’ tendency to obsess over the cost of your products. Encourage them to obsess over its value, instead.

Customers Can Smell Your Fear

Feeling totally wobbly over your price? You better get that fixed ASAP.

The best companies know they have to display a little arrogance about the value they offer in order to send an important signal to potential buyers. That signal is: We are confident in the value we provide and, therefore, the prices we charge.

Customers are like sharks: they can scent fear and weakness from miles away. And when they do, can you blame them for pushing on you for discounts and deals?

If lots of folks are asking you for discounts, this could be why. It may not be that your customers think your prices are too high. It may just be that they scent your blood in the water and can’t help themselves.

That’s just human nature, red in tooth and claw… and in pricing, too.

Takeaway: Confidence in your pricing is something that comes from within. Figure out why you’re feeling shaky, and remedy it. Then go and look for low-confidence signaling in your product, its copy, the way you talk to customers, etc., and root it out.

George Lakoff says “Change the Frame”

Remember the first bit from, oh, a minute ago? “If all you talk about is price…” — this here is the corollary.

When your salespeople get asked for a lower price, what is their response? We suggest it should be some variation of “What do you know about us and how confident are you that we can solve your business problem?” … How does the business pain impact the customer’s financial goals? How does it threaten relationships with their own customers? How does it limit the customer’s opportunities?

When customers start talking to you about price, your first and last reaction is to talk about price right back.

But this is wrong. More importantly, it’s ineffective.

The right way to respond to price concerns is to figure out if the customer: has the pain your product soothes or solves, has it in the degree that they are a good customer for you, has confidence that your product can soothe or solve it, etc.

If they are the right customer for you & your product, this line of questioning will get them thinking about just how valuable your product could be, instead of how much it costs.

If they are not the right customer, this will bring that to light… so you can ignore their opinions about price, since it’s not a good fit anyway.

Takeaway: Don’t get snared into a price conversation. Turn it into a value investigation, instead. Change the frame.

Subscribe for more Biz Book Fridays and gobs more product-makin’ & sellin’ advice, sans the sparkly unicorn farts and meatless aphorisms of other, lesser sites.


21
Oct 11

Biz Book Friday: The Hazards of Cake and Icing Pricing

Welcome to Biz Book Fridays! I’ve got a whopper of a biz book habit and I’ll read ‘em so you don’t have to. I bring the juiciest morsels straight to you.

Today I’m talkin’ two pricing lessons from the very excellent (if dry) Pricing with Confidence.

Underneath that lame-o, goatse-scented cover beats the heart of a biz book tiger.

First, your customers don’t care about your costs. They care only about the value you deliver.

Let’s say your cost is a cake. The amount you charge above the cost of that cake is the icing on the cake. Result: a cake with a thin layer of tasty icing! Deliciousness.

Too bad this (tasty) model is totally wrong.

Believe it or not, this cake-and-icing model is a real thing, called cost-plus pricing. Only there is no cake. Cost-plus pricing is one of many majestic pricing unicorns: it is easy, appealing, convenient, and in complete denial of reality.

Fact: Your customers do not care about your costs.

A customer will never think to themselves, “Gee. The price is $10, and I’ll only get $8 of value out of it… but it must have been really expensive to make! That poor little company. I’ll throw ‘em a bone.”

Never. Not once. Not ever.

Not unless they’re your mama.

What’s the alternative?

Value is the basis of business exchange. You provide products and services to customers so they can build their own value. In exchange, they take a part of that value you helped them build and return it to you in the form of price. That’s the way business is supposed to work.

You have to look at how much value your product creates for your customer, and price from there.

Let’s say you create a little screencast course that saves would-be Ruby devs hours of ineffective Googling. How much can they charge for the hours you saved them? That’s one way to look at value.

Or what about if you create a tool that helps freelancers close more leads? How many more leads will it help them close, and how much income will they get from each lead? That’s the value.

Work backwards from the value to the price. Create value — then capture it. Mwahaha.

The Bottom Line

Change the way you think about price. Don’t think about your costs: think about customer value.

Then price your product accordingly.

But… where does value come from? How do you design & create a product that creates lots of customer value? Then how do you figure out the price from there? Well, those are two of the main topics from my 30×500 Product Launch Class. Tickets are on sale now, woop woop!